logo
pub

Comparing Flux.1 Model Quantization Levels: Fp16, Q8_0, Q6_KM, Q5_1, Q5_0, Q4_0, and Nf4

Overview of Quantization Levels

What’s the issue?

When using Flux AI powered by Flux.1, comparing different quantization levels helps understand how they affect image generation quality. The main concern is finding which quantization level gets closest to the full precision model (FP16).

Identifying Quantization Differences

Quantization levels like Q8, Q6_KM, Q5_1, and Q4_0 show different performances in image quality and speed:

  • Q8: Nearly identical to FP16 in quality, needs around 24GB of VRAM but can fit in 12GB with some adjustments.
  • Q6_KM: Good for systems with 16GB VRAM, balancing size and accuracy.
  • Q5_1: Optimal for 12GB VRAM setups; best balance of size, speed, and quality.
  • Q4_0: Most suitable for less than 10GB VRAM; closest to FP16.

Implementing Different Quantizations

Solutions for Varying VRAM

  1. 24GB VRAM: Use Q8 for best quality approximation to FP16, utilize residual space for other tasks.

  2. 16GB VRAM: Q6_KM works well by keeping text encoders in RAM, ensuring enough space for intensive tasks.

  3. 12GB VRAM: Q5_1 offers a great balance, needing about 10GB VRAM and allowing additional resources like LoRAs.

  4. Less Than 10GB VRAM: Opt for Q4_0 or Q4_1 instead of NF4 for images closest to FP16.

Quality and Speed Considerations

Key Observations

  • Image Quality: Lower quantized models (like Q4 and Q5_0) can sometimes produce aesthetically pleasing images different from FP16.
  • Speed vs. Quality: Some users reported Q8 being faster than Q5, emphasizing that higher quantizations don't always mean slower speeds.
  • Consistency: NF4 showed variability, making it less predictable compared to other quantizations.

Steps to Enhance Performance

  1. Text Encoders in RAM: Move text encoders to RAM for better allocation of VRAM for image generation. This prevents the need to offload model parts to the CPU, which slows down the process.

  2. Custom Nodes and Workflows: Utilize specific nodes in tools like ComfyUI to streamline the process and ensure consistent performance.

  3. Trial and Error: Experiment with different combinations of quantization and see what fits best with your hardware and workflow requirements.

FAQs

1. What is the best quantization level for 16GB VRAM?

Q6_KM is recommended for balancing precision and VRAM usage.

2. Can I use Q8 on 12GB VRAM?

Yes, but adjustments like moving text encoders to RAM are needed to optimize space.

3. Why should text encoders be loaded into RAM?

Loading text encoders into RAM frees up VRAM space, speeding up image generation.

4. Which quantization level suits under 10GB VRAM?

Q4_0 is the best choice for models closest to FP16 with under 10GB VRAM.

5. How does NF4 perform in terms of consistency?

NF4 is less predictable and shows more variability in image quality compared to others like Q8 or Q5.

6. What should I do if my system slows down using high quantization levels?

Experiment with lower levels like Q5_1 or Q4_0 which fit better within your VRAM capacity and ensure text encoders are in RAM.

These notes aim to provide a comprehensive overview of adjusting and implementing various Flux.1 model quantization levels for optimal performance and quality in image generation.

SHARE